Category Archives: News & Notices

Court Certifies Class Action Against Public Storage, Inc.

 

The court certified a class action involving the Public Storage Tenants Insurance Program (“PSTIP”) on March 11, 2010. Bang, et al. v United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, et al., Alameda Superior Court Case No. RG06-273805.  

Plaintiffs Elizabeth Bang, Maggie Johnson and the class allege that Public Storage has sold insurance with its storage unit rentals – going all the way back to 2002 – without a license and without rate approval required by the California Department of Insurance. The court further certified the California-wide class on the claim that Public Storage deceptively failed to disclose that it controlled the insurance program even though the PSTIP was ostensibly underwritten by a series of insurance companies, including United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Discover Property & Casualty Insurance Company, and Traveler’s Indemnity Company. Class claims were also certified against the insurer defendants for unlawful and unfair offering of insurance lacking rate approval.

The case arose out of plaintiffs’ rental of storage units at Public Storage facilities. At the time of the rental, Public Storage employees urged them to buy PSTIP insurance. Maggie Johnson and Elizabeth Bang agreed to insure their personal goods with a PSTIP policy and the premium was added to their monthly bill. Not long afterwards, each of them suffered a burglary at the Public Storage site, and yet each had her claim denied. It turns out that Public Storage was not even licensed to sell insurance and the rates charged were not approved by the DOI. Yet, much of the profit from the PSTIP goes right back to a Public Storage captive entity.

The Court defined the class as follows: All persons who, at any time from June 8, 2002, through March 31, 2010, purchased coverage under the Public Storage Tenants Insurance Program at a Public Storage facility located in California.

This class includes hundreds of thousands of California consumers. Plaintiffs seek restitution of unapproved and excessive insurance premium charges, among other remedies.  A trial date has not been set, but is expected to be held in 2011.

The class is represented by the Law Offices of Kim E. Card, Bryan Kemnitzer and Nancy Barron of  Kemnitzer Barron & Krieg, and Philip Prince of San Francisco.

Also posted in Class Actions | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Repossession Class Action Refund Checks Mailed

Settlement in the consumer class action entitled Ford Motor Credit Company v O’Neal received final approval from the San Diego Superior Court on January 8, 2010, and the 60-day waiting period for appeals has expired. This paves the way for distribution of refunds to those class members who are entitled to their money back pursuant to terms of the settlement.  If you filed a claim form before the November 13, 2009 deadline, your settlement check should arrive in the mail around April 1, 2010.  Be sure to cash the check promptly.  If you did not pay any money toward a deficiency FMCC claimed you owed, but you received class notice, you are still entitled to significant benefits from this settlement.  FMCC agreed to extinguish and stop collection of approximately $110,810,774.00 in outstanding deficiency balances. Class members should order a credit report in April to make sure the negative trade line concerning the repossession account has been cleared.

Bryan Kemnitzer and Nancy Barron, of the law firm Kemnitzer Barron & Krieg LLP, along with Alexander Trueblood of Los Angeles and Lilys McCoy of San Diego, represent the class.  If you have questions concerning this case, the information hotline is 1 (877) 435-4072.

Also posted in Class Actions | Tagged , , | Comments closed

NANCY BARRON JOINS FTC PANEL ON FAIR DEBT COLLECTION

In 2009, the Federal Trade Commission held a series of significant debates. The FTC invited consumer advocates, academics, arbitration providers and debt collectors.   These recorded roundtable discussions, entitled “Debt Collection: Protecting Consumers,”  were held in Chicago, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.  The vigorous debate was intended to stimulate and inform the FTC’s role in regulating the debt collection process.  Nancy Barron was invited to join the panel discussion on September 29, 2009, as a consumer advocate.  She argued for protecting consumers’ access to the courts, which is inhibited by mandatory binding arbitration whereby consumers may be subjected to unaffordable fees, lose their right to a jury trial, have limited discovery of documents needed to prove their claim, and lack legal representation.   Transcripts of the discussion can be found at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/debtcollectround/index.shtm#090805.

Posted in News & Notices | Comments closed

Federal Court Issues Approval Order in BMW Financial Class Action

BMW Financial Services has agreed to settle a class action involving its repossession practices. Bryan Kemnitzer and Nancy Barron joined with Mark Chavez of the law firm Chavez & Gertler in litigating the matter. On September 23, 2009, the Honorable Phyllis Hamilton, judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Francisco) ordered conditional certification of a class and preliminary approval of the class action settlement reached between BMW Financial Services and class representative Derek Friedrichs.  On January 20, 2010, the settlement obtained final approval. The court found that plaintiffs had obtained substantial benefit to the class.

The class is defined as all buyers: (1) who purchased a motor vehicle in California and entered into a conditional sales contract with any person or entity that was assigned to BMW Financial; (2) whose motor vehicle was repossessed or voluntarily surrendered in California, and was not reinstated or redeemed; and (3) who were issued an NOI by BMW Financial between August 25, 2004 and September 5, 2008. Excluded are those persons who have filed bankruptcy proceedings, accounts of individuals who are deceased, those persons who signed releases with BMW Financial from any liability for Deficiency Balance payments on their accounts, and those against whom BMW obtained judgments. Read More »

Also posted in Class Actions | Comments closed

Consumer Class Action Settlement in Stephens v Bay Federal Credit Union

Automotive lender Bay Federal Credit Union agreed to settle a repossession class action settlement, which received final approval in December 2009.  Stephens v Bay Federal Credit Union (San Francisco Superior Court). Distribution will occur shortly after the time for appeals has passed. The settlement received preliminary approval in July 2009 and Class Notice was mailed. There were no objections and no appeal or other delay is expected.

Class members are California consumers (1) who purchased a motor vehicle in California and as part of that transaction entered into a purchase contract with any person or entity which contract was later assigned to Bay Federal Credit Union; (2) whose motor vehicle was repossessed or voluntarily surrendered in California, and was not reinstated or redeemed; and (3) who were issued a Notice of Intent to Sell Motor Vehicle at any time between August 4, 2004 to January 13, 2009. Read More »

Also posted in Class Actions | Comments closed

Ford Motor Credit Company Settles Class Action Concerning Repossession Notices

Ford Motor Credit Company (“FMCC”) has agreed to settle a consumer class action involving vehicle repossessions. In the case Ford Motor Credit Company v O’Neal (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2007-00077225-CL-CL-SC), consumers alleged FMCC failed to provide post-repossession notices that comply with California law. Although it denies the allegations, FMCC will provide substantial relief to the 15,877 class members, including a promise to stop collection of approximately $110,810,774.38 in outstanding deficiency balances and to refund the full amount that class members who submitted claims have already paid on their deficiencies. Read More »

Also posted in Class Actions | Comments closed